>>7896699>but look at this image! it proves its really close!>ps i only judge things based on these internet pix because my handler says im not allowed to go outsideso not only do you lack in salt and anything white, to see how that shit practically disappears because they're the same color and tiny things are tiny, but you're still trying to make an argument based on two differently shot photos?
hurp derp
here, you can watch these videos and tell them that they're wrong for saying the paint job looks smooth based on their first hand accounts of handling the toy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIqcU0T_icEhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeTXN5dgKKghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcIK676XvoAfirst three videos that came up using "one punch man mcfarlane" btw.
btw btw, what the reviewer sees is also different from what the camera sees, because that's how real life works
>ib4 everyone but you (and those that agree with you) is a shill and your contrarian opinions based on a purposely shot photo to make the flaws stand out makes you correct 