>>7565692He's generally an ok dude, but tends to rise to conflict in your typical macho bullshit kinda way. I wish he'd be more mature sometimes, but arguing on the internet is what it is.
As a toy photographer, he's pretty much guilty of the ACBA house style outlined in
>>7565488. It's devoid of taste and basic photograpy know-how, and it's the same exact thing pretty much every time. Neon bg, brick wall/diorama, cutout sound effects, dutch angle for no reason, bad framing and grasp of negative space, usually shot is crowded with a ton of mooks and shallow focus and you can't even tell what's going on. It's a bad look, and tons of people ape this style. I've said it before, and I'll say it again: he would benefit greatly from taking a basic photography class. But people just wanna jump in and get to the "fun part," without having a good fundamentals.
Also, his reviews are ok, if for nothing else than the fact that he tends to get them out very quickly after a toy's release. They have a lot of the same problems as his photos, but it's more bearable when it's just him talking on video. He glosses over details sometimes but he's usually an alright reviewer.
