>>>6779424 You're comparing apples to oranges and getting mad when they don't taste the same. I'd tell you to stop playing dumb, but you're just blind fanboy.
Here's a $30 figure that is roughly as articulated as these $45 figures.
This shows that 4H can do the same type of figures, even if they do cost more, but you're blindly defending their shitty inability to actually give yu your money's worth. As that other guy mentioned, they already put in the money to add the joints, yet they didn't bother to do anything to make them work better. That literally costs them NOTHING, but nope, somehow it's apples and oranges, despite other companies spending less money on their joints but putting more thught into them, thus making their own figures more poseable.
> this is just you being argumentative because you want to argue.Talk about projection. You tried to dismiss the criticism by blowing whatever i said out of proportion and when I asked you to back it up, you ignored it.
That's great how you think I'm only pointing out that you're contradictory just to argue, you're just trying to dismiss your point blank fanboyism logic.
>Except that they have.ok, one year and a half. Happy? And that product from last year was pretty damn flawed.
>You're pretending the 4H haven't been releasing toys, or keeping anyone updated on what they're doing, all while they DO sculpt as their main job for other companiesLOL, way to ignore that those two other companies are able to do regular releases and re-releases year round AND do their figures as a hobby/part-time job. They're exactly like 4H, except they put more effort into their side projects and actually give you your money's worth.
> you're not going to accept anything of what I or anyone else saysI'd accept it, but all you've done is deny and stick your fingers into your ears.
