>>10987192ASM2 literally bombed in theaters.
You can't argue that it didn't bomb, because even Sony thought it bombed. Hence restarting the Spiderman franchise again, but this time they worked with Marvel.
What incentive would Sony even have to work with another studio AND a giant distributor like Disney, who would all take part in the royalties and fees by being part of the production?
HMMM, i wonder what would net Sony extra money? Do toys even sell millions of dollars worth anymore? What do licenses and royalty fees get you? Would Sony actually make more money if some company used logos that came from wholly owned Sony productions?
If only there were some sort of website that allowed you to find answers to these easy questions....
Surely i don't want to look as stupid as some retards who believe some flat-earth-tier conspiracy theory that toy makers cant use likenesses from c-list actors.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/933730/000111667906001349/marvelagree.htmooof, caught by a bot but easily found with one of those website lookers: en-us/guides/posts/what-is-a-licensing-fee/
oof same shit:
backstage.com/magazine/article/merchandising-clauses-actors-39648/ 