>>6071943>most hatedHate is such a strong word. I would say strongly dislike. I only dislike the idea of them because this line really doesn't represent all body types. It's just pandering to that demographic that has always bitched about Barbie having an unattainable body. Sure they are fine with Mattel creating fat , tall, and petite, body types to better show that woman come in all shapes, and sizes, but, what about girls who are naturally thin, and have a large bust size? ??
Those woman are heavily hated, and cruelly depicted as bimbos in films like Beauty and the Beast. The new live action Beauty and the Beast film has out right cut them out of the film all together. Mattel has all, but practically ban any representation of a thin doll with large breasts since they gave Barbie her new politically correct body in the late 90s. They reduced the bust size, and increase the waist size in the late 90s, and people still bitched that Barbie wasn't realistic looking enough so in 2016 Mattel finally caved in, and started making fat barbie dolls. They tried to down play it by also releasing a tall, and petite body size at the same time. That's fine I guess, but why not also release a thin Barbie doll with a C-cup bust size?
Disney, and doll makers almost make it sound like having a large bust size in this day, and age should be viewed as something vulgar, and that any girl that has a tiny wast and large bust size should automatically be looked down upon as a bimbo or a hyper sexualized seductress.
In short I dislike fat Barbie because her whole existence is nothing, more than an attempt to appease a very annoying, and hypocritical demographic of people.
