>>5902282>I never "looks" more like the comic>The old marvel figures look way more like the old comics>The old toy biz one feels like a comic book figurelol, just shut the fuck up, cartoon nostalgiafag.
>Your talking about the characters personality. What the fuck does that have to do with the figure? Are you literally autistic? A physical trait such as appearance is inherently linked to the personality of a character. There are defining looks to them that SHOULD be represented in a figure, otherwise, it's boring bland expressions that we see in too many toys (which is found on that Toy Biz cartoon Beast). Have you not noticed that they've started using CGI to give masked characters like Spiderman and Deadpool expressive eyeholes in the movies now? EXPRESSIONS are defining traits for characters and some are iconic, such as this sculpt right here that is right out of a Jim Lee XMen comic.
Expressions are more than just facial features.
The Marvel Legend Beast? It's almost perfect in how it represents the character. It can look inquisitive, angry, thoughtful, or silly, depending on how you pose him. What does that 90s Toy Biz Beast do? Flips around like a stupid chimp and his expression is equally chimp-like. His articulation and sculpting limits his poses to being a strong chimp. That's barely Beast as a character
>but the first thing I think of is comics.What bull.
Almost all the modern Beast figures look like they came right out of the comics and here you are trying to claim that obvious cartoon figure is based on something you've never read.
