>>7892838>Again, you have no idea what you're talking about.>Shit's scanned or was already digitally sculpted. >Again, it involves more work to do what you're saying. >Again, you're literally arguing they spent more money to make it worse and for no reason.But the words I typed and the same words you quoted are saying literally the opposite of that. Is reading comprehension difficult for you?
>the detail is still there. You can count the ridges in his hair. The little subtle smile with the lips upturned on the side. The perioral region is exactly the same.But why does he have a fatter crotch in the pic you posted compared to
>>7892019? Why does it look fatter in every image you've posted so far?
>But because it's not painted, you think they changed the sculpt for the worse.Except that paint doesn't change the shower of his crotch.
>Paint matters and colored plastic is shit.This is objectively wrong. Especially like
>>7892845 says for comic book and anime characters. Saitama is an anime character with a completely flat face. There should be no detail like the blemishes in the OP caused by paint. Meanwhile the Dasin uses colored plastic and achieves a much more accurate appearance. Add shading (good shading) and it's beautiful. Colored plastic + well done shading > fully painted.
