>>10672283>I feel like you're deliberately missing the point of what I've been sayingYour entire foundation of what you're trying to claim is built on a fake ground, thus all my examples, when you keep on trying to say
>well look at how fast all this modern stuff made money and how they've already caught up!Hence my ALSO bringing up how old movies are still undisputed in their popularity, yet modern movies are catching up. How? Prices themselves don't correlate just to inflation, but also shrinking markets (fewer people going to theaters)+plain greed.
In the case of toys, they went from being under $10 in 2008 to $25 in 2023. If it was just inflation, toys should only cost $14 today. Toy markets have increased despite prices going way more up than they ever did in history. Example are 3.75" figures being $1.99 in the 80s and ~$3.50 in the early 00s, then ~$6-8 in 2012 to $14-19 today. So something like GI Joe making more money in 2023 isn't necessarily because it's more popular than it was in 2012, it's because they've just increased the price 2x.
So do you understand how everything you've been trying to claim is built out of wet paper?
IF you actually wanted to prove your point, you'd use current popular series and sales data. And to be fair about pic, i couldn't get it to find the Train movie for the comparison. Which made a little more than this Transformers movie that is considered a bomb.
Yeah, the most successful anime movie of all time only made a little more (worldwide) than a movie that is considered a bomb.
Also, i already said everything i had to about that anon's claim. The context was pretty clear. You're just pretending to be a robot and trying to make his claim to be 1 or 0.
also also
>being wrong about movies not getting re-re-re-re-releasestons of movies still get re-released, but no one cares. That culture is nearly extinct.
