>>8650552Yes, I can agree that he's way cuter than most modern Ken's. Given his whole babyfaced look, he just has nice and cute energy to me.
>>8650555I can also agree this as well! Maybe the molding/ sculpting technology in the 50s didn't have the capabilities of making small, soft, doll-like faces. Because it was a new concept at the time! (Most little girls played with a lot of baby dolls during that era) So small errors could really send it into the uncanny and uncomfortable valley. But that's just my theory!
