>>9225417No. Is that anon that doctor who has a nice collection in his office? Or the Mexican drug dealer with a fancy rumpus room with some really nice custom cabinets? There's that Halo collection guy, but his basement was mostly furnished with Ikea shit, so he probably doesn't make that much money and lives in Bumfuck, west Virginia or Dusty, Oklahoma.
>>9225505>2+2=16wut?
Since you fail at logic: a stores isn't going to make a payment for stock AND make a payment to create that stock, because it's not that profitable. Unlike what you wish to believe, they'll still try to make a profit off of what they sell ONTOP of attracting more customers.
Companies like Hasbro are more than happy to trade exclsuvies purely from just guaranteed orders, because that's how toy companies make money in the first place. Everyone wins making deals like this, unlike your retarded idea of paying for exclusives. Expecting a store to PAY to create stock will get you laughed at unless you're... shit, i really can't think of any company that actually has that sort of commanding products. Maybe Apple? Some niche as fuck boutique product with huge profit margins.
If what I'm saying weren't done, some enterprising company can freely steal my idea and make themselves rich(er) just selling extra amount of stock in exchange for cheapo redecos and frankensteins. Totally revolutionary and extremely profitable, because I'm a genius businessman with a totally original idea.
