>>9560666He probably only found out about the Toy Fair interview from me. I made these posts in the FNAF General
>>9515503 >>9529601>>9558432He probably thinks that a toy company would just toss away a succesfully selling toyline because of this ignorant post
>>9551121>He threw money like that for 8 years producing sports figuresI used to see them at Target. You know that store? One of the biggest big box stores in the US? If stores like that are ordering his shit, of course he's going to continue selling it. I stopped seeing them a while ago though, and i can only guess the line died too.
>The Art of Spawn and the last Spawn wavesAnd guess why they were the last waves? KB, Suncoast, and all the stores that were ordering that shit went out of business.
Shock and awe that toylines can only survive if there's stores that order them. If there's no stores that order your shit, a toy company stops producing it, just like the Five Nights at Freddy line.
There's no reason to just toss a license away, especially since you're stuck paying a royalties for NOT producing shit. Licenses are written so that you're promising to pay a certain amount every single year you hold that license and for every single unit you sell. If you produce nothing, you're ALSO paying a penality fee to the licensor for wasting that license.
Again, McFarlane Toys is too small of a company to just toss something away. This is why the last few waves of Halo toys were dumbed down, in order to fulfill their contract with Microsoft. They had to produce something, even though they were planning on ditching the license.
They didn't do that with FNAF because retailers didn't order them (in the quantities needed to produce a wave).
