>>6934771>The character hasn't changed much besides the changes I mentionedLOL, wut?
Sorry, but you are dumb.
Mezco's changes are no more drastic than the vast majority of redesigns he's ever gotten in the comics, and less than other mediums.
>fans wouldn't be complainingoh please.
They bitch at everything, especially with people like you who don't read comics and think his costume hasn't had drastic changes. It's like you read XMen during the 90s and think their costumes were always Jim Lee-like. Or Jim Lee era Batman, if you want a direct comparison.
>What about the other characters they've already botched with their crap designs They've made 4 Wolverines and the XForce one is pretty comic book accurate. They'll continue making more Wolverines.
Green ARrow? Ive already said i think his is better than any of the comic versions.
Sorry, but your opinion is just an opinion and you've proven you're really anal and selective about the costumes that exist.
> buying the Mezco shit designs actually hurts the chances of getting a comic-accurate figureExcept it doesn't. Mezco's already proven they'll re-re-re-remake shit and release alternate costumes, especially for popular characters.
With ones like Joker, i honestly couldn't tell you if any of them are accutually comic book accurate. Same with Deadpool. There's details that change panel from panel, artist to artist, that it's hard to keep track of. With characters like this, i think art style matters most. It's almost the same way with Spider-Man, as style is very important to how it was drawn. Yeah, of course there's different costumes, but McFarlane Spider-Man vs Bagley Spider-Man are very different from each other. The eyes, the build, the size of the spider, even how the webs were patterned, despite both of them using the same costume. Same with other artists.
