>>8130930I'm not mad man, I'm just pointing something out. I would be mad if I spent money on it.
>>8130950>The paint matches the style of the posterI mean sure. If you're blind. The poster has blended transitions that don't look like clumsily slopped paint. Hell, the poster has a more unified color scheme, because it's strongly leaning on yellow instead of being strongly disparate greens and magentas. More to the point, I know WHY the colors are wrong - those are tube colors. They just couldn't be bothered to mix the proper colors and use paint straight out of the tube.
Except the pink, which looks like complete ass anyways. I genuinely don't even know how they made it looks that bad, and I've been painting for years. I really don't see how you can compare the two and go "Yeah, the unblended sloppy mess looks like that blended and well rendered painting."
I'll agree it was intentional, sure. They knew what they were doing. I just won't agree it's good, because it's not.
