>>5792174>I dislike how there's less and less dolls that focus on aesthetic, and more that are celebrities, "characters", and/or part of their animations/"merchandising".But they've done celebrity and character and merchandise dolls since the 80s? Also, according to Mattel it's a OOAK for now.
https://twitter.com/Barbie/status/752635067151769600?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw Seems like she'd be cheap to produce so I'm sure they'll do a run of her like they did with Misty Copeland.