>>5864843>Let me put it this way. How many cars do you see in real life that are made of multiple shades of blue and gray and white?Talking about blurr who's based on a fictional vehicle in the future right, not the best way to start an argument.
>The argument here is this: Hasbro's using a more modern and realistic aestheticLooks more cheap and toyish, literally
>Takara cater to an incredible outdated and painfully cheesy look that's 3 decades old....but they're using hasbro designed molds for the most part because even they know they look good, PMOP could of just been a slavish repaint if they wanted too.
The toys, MP or generations, are still modern interpretations, even generations blurr and takara's paint job worked fine, its the form that works and takara's paint works better for making it look something worthwhile rather than something that's kid safe, because the more, complicated paint jobs are the worse off they'll be when a kids ham hands them.
>Sure, it might have contrast and variation, and that's cool and all, but does it actually look good? Or is it just an eyesore mishmash of colors that should stay in the past where it belongIts called preference anon, as a kid I would of laughed at blurr because I was never a fan of that blabbering idiot, but as I grown up I realized I liked the design, the lack of paint hurts and I would only have the hasbro version for car mode.
Its preference in the end, you might find the appeal of injected gloss glittery plastic that's very toy like, I myself prefer something with some variance, I don't want it to be just the blue guy, or the red guy (which is why, despite his abilities, I hate the dare devil design, maybe some red pants would help but traditionally he's just all red).
I'm afraid no one wins this argument, for preferences of our own makes the others preference invalid.
There is no right or wrong answer (unless takara added 15 shades of blue, or made him rainbow colored)
