>>9840979>saying they're keeping the boxes for toys because of their cost doesn't insinuate anything about their resale valueLOL, in what universe?
>You came up with that all on your own because projectionLOL, do you even know what projection means?
It's literally the opposite of what i do. See pic? That bin at the bottom has around 20 boxes of Game of Throne bannermen set. The Winterfell sets were going for double of their MSRP for a while, yet i took them all out of their package and just dumped $400 worth of minifigures and legos together into the bin, because it's easier to use them that way vs keeping 40 boxes (yes, i bought a shit ton) of mostly air in some closet.
>>9841072>Funny you'd always post that Killy figure as if it makes your taste in figures look respectable or some shit.>randomly dumping shit into a pile LOL
You only notice him probably because of that one guy who posts him in all his pictures and rants about how good he is. Like i said, most Sentinel toys are rarely mentioned on /toy/, so why would posting him be "respectable?" I have rarer, more expensive figures in those piles than him, including hipster shit 3A stuff.
But no, i totally only have these figures for "cred" and not because I love robot toys, Marvel and DC comic characters, transforming motorcycle power armor, fantasy creatures and video games.
>a lot of them just look garbage. Seems like this is always the poorfag excuses when something is priced over their budget. I remember people whining that Killy isn't worth it because he came with like a single accessory. Or nothing at all, like those robot bodies.
I mean, if the toy does look like garbage to you, okay, but when its minor issues like some hip joints or having a single accessory? Sour grapes.
