>>6253392Oh mine is probably over 1k pounds, definitely. That's one of the reasons I want to get rid of it, I'ved moved three times in the past few years, and hauling this heavy ass Lego around with me is such a pain in the ass.
Like I said, I think I could get over $10k for what I have, but if I really had the free time / dedication to completely catalog my collection I could probably get a lot more.
I have a lot of older / rare retired sets and whatnot in the collection.
I had the Eiffel too by the way, can't remember how much I sold it for though. Basically, I was willing to part with my most expensive sets to get as much money as possible quickly, and because it was easier to sell them one by one, but now I've gotten rid of almost all the multi-hundred dollar sets and everything else is in the sub <$100 range to sell and I just don't have the time to do them all individually.
>>6253400I considered that, but I'm probably never going to have kids, and if I ever do, I'll buy them their own collection. Organizing my collection took forever though, I used to leave things just unsorted or loosely sorted. I save a lot of space in the boxes too by stacking up bricks like pic related. Also allows me to kinda sort them by color as well. Dividers are just cardboard and duct tape.
