>>10071649>I'm talking about the first post YOU replied this as my 'original post', aka this one >>10071462Different anon.
>This is 'literally' and 'completely' criticizing G3Nope, because you just had to criticize G1 too to deflect the QC issues.
>Yeah superior so much that you can't touch an original one unless you become an expert in doll hair goo gone-ing.>She thinks all G1 dolls has glue seepageAre you an underage too? And yes their designs and clothes are still better than the watered down G3.
>the single autist in this thread shitting it upI see you're the samefaggot who spammed this thread with doll pics whenever G3 or current Mattel get criticized, go fuck yourself you projecting cunt.
