>>9989461>Show a toy in the 90s as poseable as the 1.0 Rider Figuarts.>ignore we're talking about sculptsGreat work at moving the goalpost, retard.
>Which has nothing to do with engineeringOh look, more attempts at ignoring the point. IT has everything to do with engineering, because they're makinga billion cuts into the sculpt of the toy, and most of those cuts aren't necessary. IT's been discussed at length in the DBZ threads, where the new articulation isn't actually better and sometimes worse.
>post a comparable 1:18 figure from the same year Again, accurate sculpts have been possible since the 00s. The IM2 line came out in 2010 and they released a billion different suits and more than a lot were sculpted accurately. Even the bad ones were still sculpted to look like a human were able to fit into the suit, without being disfigured like what the first SHF Iron Man would need to be.
Again, because people realized toys could look accurate, fans were able to accurately judge lines like LotR by Toy Biz based on real life actors likenesses and say whether theyre good or bad. This was the 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004. Pretty high standards, yet weeaboos like you in 2022 still make shit up to excuse toys like they're from the 1980s.
>Have you considered the fact that I'm a weeaboo and have lower standards than kids in the early 00s? That I'll ignore everything and come up with bullshit to defend overrated toylines?Yes.
>Ah yesLoved how you pretended robotics aren't cost saving, labor intensive toys are cheaper than those that aren't, fortnite guns aren't fortnite guns, and all your hypocritical standards that come from being a lying weeaboo.
