>>10543609yet you're trying to make the same claims, but of course, "not identical, thus not copying"
no one is fooled by that lame excuse, mongoloid.
>>10543611was talking about how McFarlane Toys started to adding more detail into the sculpt, which previously no one bothered to, because they didn't think high pressure injection molding could hold that level of detail.
Imagine if there was nobody to even test that. High pressure injection molding already existing on toys for half a century, yet no one tried to do better. Why?
