>>8799395>literally doesn'tIf you're blind.
An airbrush produces a much finer coat that looks even, unlike literal 70s quality print technology.
You can blah blah blah all you want about "but it only looks bad in macro" but you can see how shit the quality is from thumbnails, because the dots aren't packed close enough together, creating a fuzzy appearance. It WORKS (for when a fuzzy appearance like shading is ok), but it still isn't as good as proper paint apps.
Also, i really really really like how you're defending lazy budget cutting efforts, because somehow a company trying am lame.
