>>5854775>I never said that at any point you lying, strawmanning mongoloid.But that's exactly what you're saying, but you're too IGNORANT to realize that. Most of the metals used for cars require metals that require higher temperatures, because the pieces need to support high stress and high weight.
>So according to you, more expensive = bad and cheaper = goodOh look, more pretending or are you just forgetful? Again, the premium you're paying doesn't correlate with the actual cost they put into it. Again, diecast is a cost cutting feature that negatively affects a toy (details arent' as sharp, paint chips off easier, etc)
>I love how you can't even give an actual example of a collector's grade diecast toy having meaningful detail blurred out by paint.I literally mean everything. EVERYTHING is an example. Go look at any model car that uses diecast + plastic and has paint applied. Stuff from Jada/21st/Eaglemoss/Mattel all suffer from that. Judging from your last response I'm sure you're going to say "not 100x folded Japanese diecast! doesn't count!"
>hey were more pleasing than a crooked metal wireYou said it doesn't stand out as much and that's false because of the nature of glossy plastic. What i said is hyperbole and that's not strawmanning, because it directly relates to what's actually said, if exaggerated. Strawmanning is like when you straight up ignored multiple points i gave
>Japanese brands dont use wire thus bad! Yeah yeah, Nihon superior.
>You're fucking hilariousSays the guy whose argument was
>the casting process is anything but. Those steel molds don't cut themselves, and making steel molds is RIDICULOUSLY expensiveshowing your ignorance and constant need to come up with more arguments after being proven wrong time after time, all because you're butthurt over paying a premium for cost cutting features that negatively affects the toy and need to justify why it's superior. Paying money = IT MUST BE SUPERIOR (applies to the stands as well).
