>>8706237>>8706244I’m not trolling, anon. And how can I admit that I was wrong, as you’d like me to, when there was no actual evidence to back up your claims? I was just going off of what I thought. You’re technically in the same boat I’m in, you’re, for the most part, just going off of what you thought as well from what you extrapolated. However, since your information is more leaning towards the Disney side of things, you’ll obviously discount most people who aren’t directly connected to them or support them. Especially so when they’ve gone on record as disliking that company’s practices.
And plus, you mostly kept on spouting the same stuff over and over again, and that’s not really a conversation at that point, just an echo chamber, and that’s rather dull. So there you go, Walt.
