>>9173545>ALL toy companies have been losing "space" because shelf space doesn't exist for toys anymore. Did you forget why I brought that up?
>>9171657>Hasbro has been pumping out ridiculous amounts of toys over the past few decadesThey are either shrinking or they are booming but you need to make up your mind.
>Hasbro has put out MORE figures in it's multiple lines this year then in previous years and the year isn't even done yet. You might want to double check that. ML had a 180 in 2020, they haven't even broken 90 in announced figures, SW Black Series had 77 figures 2020, they just broke over 30 this summer, I could go on but I think you get the point, almost all lines have been cut in half this year, which was always the point, you can make excuses for it, but the truth "MORE figures in it's multiple lines this year then in previous years" is a bold face lie right now.
>every toyline gets relaunchedlike anon said relaunch ≠ cancellation. The GIJoe brand has stop selling for years at a time and many other brands suffered the same fate.
>retailers didn't fully support it because the figures took up too much space for not enough profit per sale.You are just shifting the blame from the original argument , TRU strongly supported all the Joe brands and as we saw with NECA and even GIJoe first successful revival in the 90s, they were all you needed and yet three Joe major lines still tail spin and crashed (Sigma Six, 30th, 50th) even with TRU aggressively supporting all Hasbro brands.
>You keep trying to claim the toys are badWhere? I didn't say anything of the sort, nor did you, because the point was you argued "No matter how bad Hasbro "screws up" as long as the figure is good, people will buy it." and I showed truth otherwise and now you have cognitively changed the argument in your head and created a false reality where you think I said they were "bad" when that was never the topic.
>It's a stupid argument I agree, it's why I didn't make it.
