>>5916925How dumb are you?
The things I criticize are things you can see with your naked eye. I've never once complained about things like this guy is saying
>>5916954 , because no shit you can't comment on stuff like that
So again, why would i buy a toy that doesn't look like it should? The 3a stuff i have, they're not meant to look like anything but what they are. Don't like the look? Your opinion.
Me not liking Toby McGuire because he's supposed to be Luke Skywalker? Why would i spend money on something like that, if that's the point of the figure? And don't play dumb that it's supposed to be stylized or whatever bullshit, because they're pushing that printing technology as true to the actor's face. And those dots are ugly by making his face look all grainy and the fact that they're faking things that should be sculpted by just printing it on.
> your arguments have no weight because you looked at a couple pictures compared to people who actually have the toyUnlike the life you've chosen to live, there's a world outside your bedroom and computer. There are places called stores and conventions where I physically buy and see in person almost everything /toy/ talks about. Here's a pic i took last year, to show my ability to touch and see things you'll never physically touch or see. Somehow, people like yourself twisted my proof of being able see these toys in person and said i shooped the print job to look worse. Which is funny to me, because they basically admitted its worse than they originally thought.
>>5916965>I lie all the time>despite the fact i point toward any archive to prove points>despite the fact that none of those images you're saving about my sexy self show a lieoh right, i totally doctored these images, despite the fact that the little dots you claim i added would be impossible to tell if they were or weren't because of how that tech works. Nevermind my posting of the images was just to show I can buy these toys in person.
