>>10400941>The vast majority of them are positive. So why do you keep misrepresenting the situation as if it's all negative?I don't think I've ever seen the guy give a single toy a bad review. All of them are positive, even when they're completely shit toys.
He still points out all the bad shit on them though, including the loose joints and bad paint jobs. It's why i keep watching his videos, despite everything being teh greatest toy ever.
But sure, i'm totally misrepresenting Joytoy's shitshow by posting a picture of their own toys.
>>10400950Way to ignore the proof i already posted
>>10400909>>10401007Seriously, are you guys illiterate?
I literally described how the QC is bad, yet you keep pretending i said nothing. Are you blinded by rage at how pictures and descriptions show how shit Joytoy is or is this like the rest of your post where you want to shit on every other company to pretend Joytoy is somehow better?
>an inconsequential and entirely fixable minor QC blipI shouldn't need to buy tools and paint/putty to fix fuck ups on $50-90 toys.
You might as well be telling me if i can't make a better toy myself, i cant criticize Joy Toy.
