>>5398469I'd actually be more inclined to call YOU underage, considering those over the age of 30 would look at these things and say "that's a cool toy", but, i digress. also,
>>5398514wasn't me, but I certainly agree, considering the way you're acting. you deserve a ban simply for not knowing that T2L are allowed on /toy/. how dumb could you be? could you possibly be any more retarded? like, is that possible? I don't think so. jeez. what an idiot.