>>8358015>Where did I say that?>Are you also mad that Peter Parker isn't portrayed as a teenagerIf you weren't talking about Ultimate PArker.... why? No one was talking about 616 Parker, because the figures are of the Ultimate Spidermans. Stay on track, retard.
>I mean it's nowhere as buffLOL, it doesn't matter. The figure itself doesn't portray Ultimate Spiderman, who was always shown to be scrawny.
>The Bagley art isn't that much skinnierHe's fucking thinner than Black Cat, who's also taller than him. Again, his sculpt is an adult manlet, not a scrawny teenager.
>They would totally sell as well as MLs if they had the same consistencyLOL, again, DC shit isn't even half as popular as Marvel PERIOD. There's no chance in hell that DC toys would suddenly jump in sales 1000% because McFarlane started cheaping out like Hasbro.
This is nothing but a delusion that only retards have, because you're basing it on nothing but the bullshit in your ass.
>The fact that people have been screeching for a DC Legends equivalent Icons, Essentials (oh ho ho ho, and DCC was cheaping out as much as Hasbro did with this line, yet it still didn't sell), and now McFarlane. Oh wait, but it's not to scale with MLs, huh? That's why the screeching happened, because DCC's Icons were actually 1:12 scale compared to Hasbro's 1:11 and 1:10 scale creep line. Nevermind McFarlane's line and the Essentials line are 1:10, so the screeching continues.
Also, that's funny if you think I'm losing my shit over a mistake i made. It only proved my case that Hasbro doesnt care to provide any consistency with what they're trying to output.
But keep reaching, retard, and believing nonsense you can't even back up.
