>>7809326I'm going to write it very plainly so that you understand: I was complaining about their choices of name alterations, not that they changed the names in the first place. What I said in my original post was the following, but written at a younger reading level for you:
"The team who decided to change the names of the characters changed the names this way: They changed "Jala" to "Jaller", "Maku" to "Macku", and "Huki" to "Hewkii". They said they were going to change the spelling without changing the way it is pronounced, but these spelling changes do actually change the way you say it. Were they illiterate?"
You replied:
"They changed them because of maori legal troubles."
Do you see the problem with your reply? It's what's called a non-sequitor; it doesn't have any relation to what was previously said. Ergo, I replied with "Are you illiterate, too?" because you clearly could not read what I said.
for the sake of everyone you live and work with (or I guess go to school with, because apparently you need better education) I hope you start paying more attention and get a better grasp of English before mouthing off like that again.
