>>5936859>Who needs their figure to be 1:1 to source material?Yeah, why would you want your expensive Japanese toys to actually LOOK like the character they're based on?
I don't even think it's a bad looking figure, but
>>5935439 looks awkward as fuck for a promotional photo that is supposed to make you want to buy it. I'm not that other anon, but I agree that he looks too lanky.
The thing is, the sculpting and paintwork already look amazing, on the accessories as well. It's so close to being perfect, but isn't quite there. It's a shame for them to put so much effort into it, only to stumble at the last minute.
