>>10206209>i wasn't shilling>i was just baiting... so you're saying you're just a retard saying retarded shit for free? But what about these posts? were they just bait too?
https://i.4cdn.org/toy/1672372588936751.pngSounds like you're trying to throw me off your trail, just like how you pretended Hong Kong doesn't use the same electric outlets as England.
>Dudes be posting literal side by side comparisons of figs Yeah, and you can see how the proportions are all off.
For whatever reason, the GW model has finer detail and skinnier. Did the guy shoop the image or something? Or is there official art they used just have fatter skeleton with fatter cross, a thicker sword. The grimace on the model looks like he's talking, whereas the JT figure just looks like a bad smile. The belt has smaller studs (skulls?) and more of them than the model, which more than hints they're looking at some other art if they're adding more detail than what's on the model.
For the tau suit, it's the opposite, where they elongated everything and shrunk down details, like teh crests right above the knees.
Again, anyone with eyes can see that nearly everything is different. No shit do they look samey, but because artists create drawings first and then base their sculpts on that art. Both the model and the toy, except GW chibifies their models, because that's how all their models ahve been since the 80s that people still use to this day.
FAct still remains though, we have actual source book drawings of the SMs and the Joytoy SMs look closer to the art. They don't have the giant heads the models have. Their legs and arms are longer and thinner like the source book art. They're also thinner and taller, just like the art.
Just pretend you're just trolling me right now and not a retarded shill trying to defend Joytoy with dog logic, because anyone with eyes can see the models are chibi and the toys aren't. You can see the difference from the thumbnail, because it's that obvious.
