>>7739699who said i have an allergy against basic painted toys?
Again, my point has always been that a $40+ figure should have better paint than the Mattel-tier paint jobs you keep on defending.
>conveniently ignore the many, many highly-painted figures they've done like the various SHF Iron Man figs with their metallic redBig whoop.
Hasbro made these $8 figures with some of the most brilliant looking metallic paint jobs I've ever seen that aren't vacuumed metallics. Shit's so chromie you expect to see your face in it. As with most metal shit, a monitor will never do the shiny chromeness justice.
Their MU Silver Surfer is straight up Robocop 2 metallic. pearlesque as fuuuuck.
My Figma Iron Man is pretty great too, much better than Bandai's metallic, but still below the witchery Hasbro did almost ten years ago.
That said, a clean looking IM is much different than something that belongs in Warhammer 40k. As I've said, it would be a disservice not to have a properly weathered/hightlighted/shaded WH40k figure and Bandai has shown they're too cheap to do that.
