>>11369500Always love how you ignore parts of my post to have any sort of argument, because you have no argument. You're just deflecting, because you can't actually defend 4H charging $550 for a dragon and also charging $150+$150 for accessories that should have been included with the dragon.
Again, a lot of those images existed before Kickstarter. They've also had exploded/break down images a month or three before, showing the inner workings and construction of the figure. They parade almost all their prototypes almost a year before release, routinely ask for feedback, and brought their dragon out to SDCC more than a year before the KS even started. Front and center prototype, not behind glass. Couldn't touch it, but they demonstrated it for me.
Whereas... where's anything of 4H posing their dragon? Where's an entire page of showing off the inner workings of the articulation on their store like CB did? Are they still using a floppy wire for the tail that'll break a year from now if try and pose it like all bendy wires do? Are the 50PoA actually not 50PoA because it's mostly just wire?
Does 4H even ask for feedback? Considering they shit on their customers just for complaiing about the bad QC and the fact that their engineering is still from 2004.. probably not.
Not even sure the about crazyass shit you're trying to say about a post I literally made last Saturday. Meds wearing off?
>>113695024 crazy shills believing the same thing doesn't mean shit if they're just crazy shills.
They're just crazy shills who are angry I'm not sucking 4H's dick and saying they're us a favor by not including all the accessories with an overpriced dragon (that literally nobody in thsi thread is even buying because of how overpriced it is) because they're overcharging everyone $150 a pair of wings and that would make the dragon $700 if they included their accessories!
Nah, that's such a rip off and the shills are mad I'm pointing out how fucked up 4H's pricing is.
