>>6585491>Your point falls flat given >>6585313 NOOOOPE.
That one is just way too stretchy. Look at that fucking neck and how the head somehow falls below his fucking chest. wtf.
The other one is pretty good as pictured, but it undoubtedly has a very ugly backend like a fast food hamburger advertisement.
>>6585494The silhouette would still be intact. Yeah, the anatomy would suffer physical harm, but it's not disjointed and/or floating or/and stretching.
And i'd like to point out that even artists get hate for doing the same thing (stretching, disjointedness, etc). See Ramos' run on SpiderMan and Wolverine.
>>6585495Nah, maybe you should leave to a forum that only circlejerks the stuff you like, because people should be allowed give their opinions however they like. Even then, don't get angry if someone calls you on your bullshit when you take an extreme view.
Or hop back to whatever general you think is your safespace where only circlejerking is allowed.
