>>11249974>both are bad,LOL, you're insane.
You've literally been complaining about shit you literally can't see and even IF what you're bitching about did exist, you still can't see it unless you put it right next to your face.
You're literally bitching just to bitch, because you're a contrarian and/or a fanboy who needs to justify shitty paint jobs that you can literally tell how cheap it looks from low resolution photos that isn't even a close up.
$50-100 toys shouldn't look like they were painted by Hasbro, no matter how hard you need to pretend everything else is worse.
>Like, seriously, are you telling me pic related would look better if GSC used paint for every surface instead of using plastic with paint for details?At the quality McFarlane was in the 00s? Literally, yes.
>b-b-b-b-but-but but butNo, buts, retard. Your counterarguments have literally been PRETENDING to see something you literally can't see at the resolution posted.
Good Smile doesn't need to put washes or dry brushing, since it's not supposed to look worn or damaged. Just bright, flat, smooth colors that will match the anime and any official art way better than glossy colored plastic
pic of cheap glossy colored plastic you can tell is cheap glossy colored plastic from the thumbnail. From a fucking THUMBNAIL of a professionally shot promotional image. Yet you want to bitch about something you can only see if it's blown up 10x or eight inches from your eyeball? Be less insane, plz.
