>>10453531The evidence is the figure itself. First of all, don't ever forget that every photo of Metal Cooler was enough to make you lose your marbles and shit your pants on a daily basis for a month straight. Secondly, that video and picture was most likely taken with a phone, which is nowhere near the same quality as a professional camera. Now compare that to shots taken by an actual photographer with a DSLR that's able to produce more accurate colors via adjusting the aperture, white balance, iso, and etc. Yeah you know just like the promo shots that broke your mind beyond repair? Also consider that picture was taken at a showroom, which is brightly lit, there's no way it's going to be that dim in there as it seems in those set of photos and video. In other words, metal cooler figure is going to look like this
>>10452573 and
>>10452592, which was taken literally at the same place. In other words, that's how he will look like in a realistic setting i.e. under lights and natural light. Look at pic related, you can literally see how exposure levels can change the color of the sky and everything in it. Crazy how that works right? Now that you've been educated, you can go fuck yourself.
