>>10468006>You aren't special.seems like i am, given how so many people here are unaware of how these toys look in person and only repeat /toy/ memes
>Then how is it that their likmesses are worse than the SHF?You're judging SHF based on a low res sticker. The sculpts themselves are largely soft and features sometimes don't even match, like overly large triangle noses.
Again, if you saw these toys in person, this becomes apparent. It's like Obi Wan here or Han sculpts, where the warts and scars are only painted on. It's downright lazy. Very soft cartoony sculpts, but that just might be the sculptor.
Whereas you actually see defining features accurately done on Hasbro and DCC all the time, even in 1:18 scale.
Are they perfect 100% of the time? OF course not, but time and time and time again, we've seen accurate sculpts and even definitive sculpts too, where new sculpts look bad compared to old sculpts.
>I don't know if you're deliberately misinterpreting what I saidSays the retard who can't even answer a simple question nor backs up any of his claims. All you do is talk about your feels on the plastic, knowing nothing of what they actually are, what their cost is, or anything that would actually denote anything of their quality. Your entire OPINION on this matter is that YOU like how Figuarts feel, THUS it's worth $1b.
Nevermind you're lying about owning that armored Batman. Everything but the shoulder pads are hard plastic. There is no give anywhere else that could even be considered "gummy" (didn't look for the optional holding hands, where you DO want give)
And none of those toys in my box were even damaged, because they're not made of shitty plastics or use shitty fragile paints. I mean, i don't own modern Revoltechs and since the photos in this thread show how crumbly and fragile they are, maybe this is why you're so triggered over toys in a box? because you think all expensive toys are made of shitty plastics and crumbly paint like Revoltechs?
