>>5909179>Still, back then it offered some great figures and many even viewed them to be a general improvement over the molds/articulation scheme used by Toybiz WAT? Maybe by someone who only liked DC shit, but that's some outrageous claim you got going, especially when /toy/ was pretty fanboyish about the Toy Biz line back then
>a definitive Batman that was considered the most definitive 6-inch version for quite some time.See, even back in the day, I still wouldn't accept this shit, considering the type of toys Toy Biz and other companies were offering. It's also why i passed on DCC's 90s quality swivel figures, especially back then when their quality of sculpt and paint wasn't all that high.
I had pretty "high expectations" where i needed toys to be as good as 80s figures like COPS and then Toy Biz's figures raised the standards super high with their MLs.
So nothing from Mattel back then was anything i would have considered definitive, not even their BAFs, which could stand for some improvements.
>DCUC never reached its full potential,As a Mattel product, it definitely reached its full potential.