>>11036263>still trying to push a non-patented technique that had already been a decade old as something costly because a collector toyline used it 13 years after budget children toys already used it>pretends it's something complicated, despite taking fewer steps than normal paint apps>why are you hostile to mebecause you're a retard who can't stop with his cognitive dissonance and your bullshit doesn't make any sense.
It was already explained here
>>11035136 and
>>11035148 how shit actually works and you're proving how ignorant you are in technology/manufacturing.
The only way what you're saying would work is if they shared a factory. Or hired outside factories to do it for them, but again, even fucking toy companies from India have the money to make everything in house.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zypl-RDIc44Only tiny toy companies like Acid Rain (ori?), 4H or Marauder Gun Runners need to share a toy factory, and would benefit from some other toy company investing in the tools for them to bring costs down, because they're making thousands to low-tens of thousands of figures.
Bigger companies, even smaller ones like McFarlane, run their own factories and are selling millions of units every quarter. So they bring in brand new tools as easily as they bring in brand new molds, because they're making millions of dollar every quarter, if not billions. The scale of operations are there, unlike with 4H or Spero Toys.
If you're not retarded, are you some shitty third party Transformers maker and think that's how Hasbro or Mattel operate too? But that's still a low IQ take....
pic of age old toy manufacturing technique, but I'm sure there's a watchfag who'll pretend it's super duper complicated and just much better because they charge $20,000 for it, and just can't be compared at all to what budget children toys use, despite literally being the same shit.
>but the QC worker is paid $100 an hour to inspect it!pretentious oof
