>>8148059>medicines aren't luxury productslol, classic coddled babby. Sorry, but rich people get much better treatment than you too, including seeking medical care in other countries (like USA) for even better care. Nevermind the 3rd world perspective.
And you're retarded.
I think the designer clothes analogy is more apt for you, because you want to pretend only you can own levis jeans and everyone else is a poorfag if they don't like Levis.... despite the fact that you're only making these retarded analogies because someone revealed that your favorite company is ripping you off by overcharging you.
BTW, i think Todd McFarlane is richer than if 99% of this board's people were combined. So i don't think he's mad when he said that import companies are overcharging you and in his recent kickstarter he already said that something that like only nets him something like 20% of the sales he would normally get, which he compared to what collector toys usually sell at (tens of thousands vs hundreds to millions of units).
Also, i like Lucky Jeans. They fit me best.
>>8148045I remember something about designer clothes, but cellphoens? wut.
Maybe it was to point out how non sequitor it is, like
>>8148059 keeps trying to do?
>8148081so two retards?
And yes, you're retarded too, because again, R&D. The costs are spread out over both. In fact, the implication is that the HIGHEr priced option is covering the cost for the lower priced option.
You know what is actually an apt analogy? Like how Hasbro makes a brand new mold for Marvel Legends wave 7 or includes more accessories for a figure in GI Joe Wave 2. The costs for those new/more things is spread over the rest of the wave.
But i understand why you really really really really really need to force the processor analogy, because you're like an audiophile who needs to believe his overpriced thing is inherently better because he paid so much for it.
In truth, it's like Costco brand batteries vs Duracells.