>>11577327Bro, I'm agreeing with you that it's not ok that they fucked up. I was just pointing out WHERE the fuck up occurred and that I don't like them using renders for the promo material on actually solicited toys. They should be using actual photos of the toy and in package photos on the actual solicitations you see at various websites. At least the websites got the box contents correct in the description. Not an excuse mind you, but it's clear that the issue was they used an outdated render as the solicitation/promotional images. Pretty glaring fuckup, not sure how no one caught that.
