>>9534800I'd don't think that's fair, some of the criticism is on point, the issue is that there are other times where the nitpicking is so obvious, you can see it from a mile away.
The core complaint or the elephant in the room is that McFarlane's toys aren't aesthetically up a few of the posters' alley, in that they're alternative or stylized "edgy" versions, whereas the desire here seems to be for more classic designs.
But the complaints are masked as shitty overall toys, which I don't think is the case.
At the very least they can produce better toys than what came before, style aside.
They should just focus on more orthodox designs.
