>>7512907>>7512912You are shifting your narrative again. Every point or question you make is answered and ends but you then shift to an even dumber counterpoint so I'll go ahead and roll with this.
>You started it.The anon that started this was
>>7508695 spewing data he didn't understand and lumping Star Trek with Galoob even though by the buyout Galoob had already stop, this conversation has now devolved into a weird child crying that Star Trek is somehow not getting a fair shake and they keep poking at things like Hasbro.
>And Hasbro could've picked up the figure license for little more Are you an insider? Do you know any of the inner workings? did you just ignore
>>7512786 ? And again, why not get mad at Matty too? They had a chance at the line then but passed on it back when the first reboot film happen. And Playmates still had the license at that time but made nothing due to the mess that
>>7512786 posted.
>Most of what I've seen from them since TNG are stactions and props.They still make figures but it's rare to see them out as much use to be you could find them at Gamestop, Target, the now dead TRU and BAM. Now I only see them at BAMs and local comic stores. However these guys just rolled in start of this year and a few months from now we are getting some select TNG of the same kind
>Maybe splitting across 3 scalesHasbro has done this without issue. Marvel had 4 scales on shelf at one time and all that occur was the less receive ones died out while the 6inch Legends line kept going. Star Wars before the mess that was Disney's films had 6inch and 3.75inch selling fine in stores without need to change anything up. Playmates TMNT and Hasbro's Transformers lines have also had as many as 6 scales at once roiling around and all that happen was the weaker sellers went away. Star Trek didn't sell well at any scale, so guess what? It all went away.
