>>11425722>also, that's not "malicious and unjustified harming of a person's good reputation"Yes you did, you said this:
>Toy reviewers who obtain illegally acquired toys and make money by showing them off before the company does are doing something unethical. There's no way around it. They're profiting on others illegal, unethical actions.That's you, spreading around here that he's unethical, which is character assassination. The framing of your issue with PrimeVsPrime says it all:
1. Toy reviewers who obtain illegally acquired toys (no evidence, just speculation).
2. Makes money showing them off before the company does.
Dafuq is wrong with you to make out someone is being unethical over nothing is ridiculous and spiteful.
>Unfortunately for you, PVP has admitted he doesn't limit himself to only obtaining legal copies of product for his reviews, so I am 100% justified, even if you don't like it.I don't care, and neither should you.
