>>10025116>The colors are wrong too. It's like the guy who did it just saw this(>>10024438 (You)) image and thought that's the way it should be.But it is supposed to be that way.
Do you think this is supposed to look all blurry and compressed? It's shot on film, which is beyond 4k digital films today.
You're like one of those people who believes that the world was black and white before the 1940s, because that's how it appears in movies before the 1940s.
The reason some shots look all gross and dark is because people didn't take care about how shit was stored. Since film degrades, colors shift over time, hence so many movies needed to be remastered when companies started releasing DVDs, because it could a higher resolution than VHS and way better colors too. Quality started to matter. Same shit with BD.
So shit like 2001: A Space Odyssey got people being WOWWED, saying that it looked like it was shot in modern times because it got remastered for DVD and BD, because most people had only seen it broadcast in blurryass low resolution cable or blurryass low resolution VHS, and thought all old movies were supposed to look gross and dark.
Also, shit like print? Magazines that use glossy paper is usually higher end paper, which gives you more accurate color, unlike pages from 70s and 80s comic books and manga, which used gray/brown newsprint paper which has shittier whites than fucking Costco toilet paper. Also, the colors they used was also more limited too back then. Nevermind that paper also deteriorates and makes everything look all dingy and shit overtime.
In short, Bandai's Toei Spiderman is based on a crusty 70s manga advertisement on the back cover that they found in a lice filled cardboard box behind their grandma's radiator.
