>>7626596Why would i comment on that when i wasn't even sure about it in the first place?
Again
>you need to pretend I'm on some 720p monitor and that's why i can't notice this shit, yet you're defending a printing tech that's more than 10x lower in resolution and less packed together, and saying it's the same as a tampograph (a solid block of color).>>7626606>i can notice a difference in resolution that's made up thousands of little colored dots but when it comes to muh brand i think hundreds of dots looks finehue
