>>7618603>So better QC, engineering and faces are "for the worst"? Are you insane?Are you?
less paint, uglier cuts, handicapping themselves with low res prints, and same bad sculptors who continue to fail. Like i said, they're mostly the same, but some shit looks real bad. Pic related to how it's been the same shit as always from Bandai.
I honestly don't know about QC issues, but that's just how QC works huh? 2-20% chance of getting something bad and i'm lucky to never get some QC error... but then, i actually physically shop around a lot, so i can see if something is fucked up or not. Can't say i see or hear about errors anymore today than yesterday, especially here on /toy/
>you mean figures that are over a decade old?Yep, Revoltechs were a game changer. Before them, high amount of articulation wasn't anywhere to be found in any non-McStatue way for Japanese toys. Still there hasn't been much of a change once they moved away from Yamaguchi's idiotic cut joints (2008? 2009?) that were outdated even in the 90s. I honestly haven't paid them much mind since Yamaguchi became hte main focus for the REvoltech line though. Judging by /toy/'s threads, the only Revoltechs being made anymore are Yamaguchi's ugly Marvel figures.
Based on what you've said, you seem to believe that non-ugly sculpts are "updates", but that's not true at all. Again, see pic. They keep the same sculptors and they continue to make ugly sculpts, along with other weird flaws almost at random.
Lotta stuff from 15 or so years ago still holds up today, if not is remarkably better. Sorry to hear you don't like washes, but a lot of us do, hence being a mainstay with modelers, customs, and higher end toys.
And that's funny that you want to make the Windows 98 as some throwaway example, but you've proven yourself to be a poorfag and i don't doubt you had to resell your software and computers to afford your next one... or just to buy food at your neighborhood gutter-oil-using food cart?