>>6478488>When you operate in hyperbole, and then claim that your opinion comes from some sort of innate knowledge of a product despite admitting ignorance on it... that's pretty much what anybody would consider infantile.First off, that post you called infantile is some other guy's post.
Second, I don't think calling a toy that features the same articulation you'd find in a 90s toy, which is 4 steps back from what Mattel released in the 2000s with their DCUC line, which was 2 step behind what other lines in 2000 were producing as "univeral trash" a term of hyperbole.
Universal trash is pretty apt when it comes to Mattel's crap they're shitting out.
But are you the same guy who claimed that Mattel is making ML clones? Because i'm still waiting for proof on that claim.
>>6478511No, this is all they've shown off for their 6" figures at SDCC, which is a good sign that Mattel isn't producing anything anymore and basically giving up.
Last year they had way more to show, which means that there is almost no support from retailers now.
We're closer to Ding Dong the Wicked Witch is Dead rejoicing.
