>>10655842>yeah, I'm much more open to accepting a janky toy most of the time if it's more "honest" I guess, or if it has a cool concept. This idea of "well it won't be 100% perfect if done properly so they should cheat/not do it at all" is so strange to me. Of course where someone draws the line varies but the idea of none at all just feels self-defeating. Like at that point just buy statuesNo kidding, it's like if there's a chance the toy will get compromised then it will automatically be a bad toy apparently. Which is sentiment born out of the CW limb bots being quadchangers and are compromised as a result. I don't agree on that because like I said nothing in this world is perfect and being technically a better toy does not equate to a good toy if there's nothing else special about it. The whole point and reason the Autobots from Energon are designed the way they are is to facilitate the shirt and pants mode gimmick thus bigger legs and sometimes very boxy torsos. Remove that and you're left with just nothing,
