>>6947290No you're dumb. Go read the thread and come back to me, because you're literally asking me to restate everything that's been talked about.
Fucking robots stop trying to emulate an illiterate 9 year old ADHD kid.
>>6947295>right there: >>6947222No shit? Again, that wasn't stated in the thread. You made up the conversation that didn't exist, because everyone was being too busy offended that someone doesn't understand why someone likes Star Wars and not stating why they like it because they felt like howling.
But again, I'll play along and pretend that post was actually restating things said in this thread.
>Because unless it's a clone with the exact same memories it's not the same, even slugs learn from different life experiences.That's fine and all, and just like my personal toys that have "character" from me playing with them, having uneven joints, scraps, etc, but the attachment is weird when some hyperactive cat is going to act almost the same as the other hyperactive cat which behaves like the other hyperactive cat, which is a little bit different from the asshole cat.
But where's that deep profound relationship which can be gotten with a person or other social animal like a dog? Something complex, that goes deeper from shared experiences, knowing that they also cared about you and who you were? It's not an interactive screensaver, which you'll miss when it's gone, but there will always be another one. A social animal is something you want to share your life with. A dog may not be as intimate as a person could be, but there's so many other ways you can share your life with them, that you know they'll also enjoy... or not, depending on if they like going out.
Dogs are cool like that, because you can do so much with them.
>people don't always need rational reasons to care for something as if it was irreplaceable.Hence hoarders.
I don't understand the anxiety that someone can get from what could literally be shit not being there.
